资源包剽窃问题的解决办法
本帖最后由 XHG78999 于 2022-12-22 12:07 编辑rt，想采访一下各位关于侵权的想法
最好也在下面谈一谈
本来挺好的，现在都被搞成这样了 本帖最后由 州周 于 2022-12-22 12:31 编辑
必须得开源啊，不开源问题都找不到，我觉得要制定一个开源协议
About This Content19 May, 2009LicenseThe Eclipse Foundation makes available all content in this plug-in ("Content"). The Content is dual licensed and is provided to you under the terms and conditions of the Eclipse Public License Version 1.0 ("EPL") as well as the Apache Software License Version 2.0. A copy of the EPL is available at http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v10.html. A copy of the ASL is available at http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html. For purposes of the EPL, "Program" will mean the Content.If you did not receive this Content directly from the Eclipse Foundation, the Content is being redistributed by another party ("Redistributor") and different terms and conditions may apply to your use of any object code in the Content. Check the Redistributor's license that was provided with the Content. If no such license exists, contact the Redistributor. Unless otherwise indicated below, the terms and conditions of the EPL still apply to any source code in the Content and such source code may be obtained at http://www.eclipse.org.jetty-util artifact only:
The UnixCrypt.java code implements the one way cryptography used by Unix systems for simple password protection. Copyright 1996 Aki Yoshida, modified April 2001 by Iris Van den Broeke, Daniel Deville. Permission to use, copy, modify and distribute UnixCrypt for non-commercial or commercial purposes and without fee is granted provided that the copyright notice appears in all copies.
州周 发表于 2022-12-22 12:29
必须得开源啊，不开源问题都找不到，我觉得要制定一个开源协议
About This Content19 May, 2009LicenseThe...
这是EPL1.0（而且还是从jetty里面copy的
EPL只适用于代码，你伯尔尼也没提到啊 要是付费的话岂不是搞独裁？ BigPineapple 发表于 2022-12-22 12:57
要是付费的话岂不是搞独裁？
又没说只有付费，可以免费+审核啊（大恼 说得好啊，所以我选择开放+法律武器:D
那我到底是正方还是反方捏（（ 本帖最后由 jwellyangmc 于 2022-12-22 14:01 编辑
BigPineapple 发表于 2022-12-22 12:57
要是付费的话岂不是搞独裁？
是的，可以在车包里加水印，比如驾驶室里，车厢里，标签里等总之就是无处不在，要删得高血压那种
应该能防90%的，除非那人特别有耐心.......
州周 发表于 2022-12-22 12:29
必须得开源啊，不开源问题都找不到，我觉得要制定一个开源协议
About This Content19 May, 2009LicenseThe...
开源协议是有一堆的，但也得注意选择
比如MIT协议，所有人都可以修改以及盈利，你要是看别人都用这个你就乱用，然后别人拿了你的东西盈利你也没处说理，因为你都允许了盈利的（） 要开源的话倒是能有所谓的“自由文化”，但也不是完全自由，必要还是需要用法律保护自己的
但像CC这种的可能没啥法律约束力，因为他是国际性的